From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Loudspeaker redirects here. For the Marty Friedman
album, see
Loudspeaker (album).
An inexpensive 3.5 inch driver, using a paper cone.
Typical of those in small radios. Low fidelity.
An expensive 4 way, floor standing, high fidelity
bass reflex loudspeaker with ribbon tweeter; the
ribbon is at the top, the reflex port at the bottom.
A loudspeaker, speaker, or speaker system
is an
electromechanical device which converts an
electrical
signal into
sound.
The term loudspeaker is used for both individual devices and for
complete systems consisting of one or more drivers (as the
individual
transducers are often called) in an
enclosure, often with a
crossover circuit.
Loudspeakers, usually small ones, are used in small radios,
in computers, as warning signals (like alarm systems), and in
numerous other situations. They can be very inexpensive,
sometimes costing only pennies, but the range also includes
high-fidelity speaker systems costing thousands of dollars.
Loudspeakers are the most variable elements in any audio system,
no matter the cost, and are largely responsible for marked
audible differences between otherwise identical systems.
|
Contents
-
1
History
-
2
Driver design
-
2.1
Driver types
-
2.2
Enclosures
-
3
Electrical characteristics of
a dynamic loudspeaker
-
4
Interaction with the listening
environment
-
4.1
Loudspeaker placement
-
5
Loudspeaker directivity
-
5.1
Point sources
-
5.2
Line sources
-
6
Other driver designs
-
6.1
Horn loudspeakers
-
6.2
Piezoelectric speakers
-
6.3
Plasma arc speakers
-
6.4
Heil Air Motion
Transducers
-
6.5
Electrostatic loudspeakers
-
6.6
Digital speakers
-
7
References
-
8
See also
-
9
External links
|
History
Alexander Graham Bell patented the first loudspeaker as part
of his telephone in 1876. This was soon followed by an improved
version from
Ernst Siemens in Germany and England (1878).
Nikola Tesla is believed to have created a similar device in
1881[1].
The modern design of moving-coil drivers was established by
Oliver Lodge in (1898)[2].
The moving coil principle was patented in 1924 by
Chester W. Rice and
Edward W. Kellog.
These first loudspeakers used
electromagnets because large, powerful
permanent magnets were not available at reasonable cost. The
coil of an electromagnet, called a field coil, was energized by
direct current through a second pair of connections to the
driver. This winding usually served a dual role, acting also as
a
choke coil filtering the
power supply of the
amplifier to which the loudspeaker was connected.
The quality of loudspeaker systems until the 1950s was, to
modern ears, poor. Developments in cabinet technology and
changes in materials used in the actual loudspeaker led to
audible improvements. Despite their low-tech appearance, paper
cones (or coated paper cones, where the paper is treated with a
substance to improve its performance) are still in use today and
can provide good quality sound. Plastics (e.g.
Polypropylene), metals (e.g.
aluminum), and composite materials (e.g. fiber-reinforced
materials) are also used as diaphragm materials.
Additional improvements in loudspeaker technology occurred in
the 1970s and since, with the introduction of higher temperature
adhesives, improved
permanent magnet materials, improved cone materials,
improved thermal management, and new transducer designs.
Driver design
Cut-away view of a dynamic loudspeaker
The most common type of driver uses a lightweight semi-rigid
diaphragm (the cone), a coil of fine wire (the voice coil),
a magnet structure with a circular gap, and a rigid support
structure (typically called a basket, or frame). The voice coil
wire is usually
copper, though
aluminum, or, rarely,
silver, may be sometimes used. Modern magnets are almost
always permanent and made of
ceramic,
ferrite,
Alnico, or, more recently,
rare earth. The size and type of magnet and the magnetic
circuit differ depending on design goals. A current trend in
design, due to increases in transportation costs and a desire
for smaller, lighter devices (as in home theater multi-speaker
installations), is the substitution of ferrite magnets with rare
earth types. Baskets must be designed for rigidity so as to
avoid the voice coil rubbing against the magnet structure in the
gap, and are typically
cast or
stamped metal, although molded plastic baskets are becoming
common, especially for inexpensive drivers.
The
voice coil is attached to the small end of the cone. The
coil is oriented coaxially inside the gap, a small circular
hole, slot, or groove in the magnetic structure within which it
can move back and forth. The gap establishes a concentrated
magnetic field between the two poles of a
permanent magnet; the outside of the gap being one pole and
the center post (a.k.a. pole-piece) being the other. The center
post and back-plate are sometimes a single piece called the
yoke. In addition to these components, electro-dynamic drivers
also include a suspension system to keep the coil centered in
the gap and to provide a restoring force to make the speaker
cone return to a neutral point after moving. A typical
suspension system includes the spider (a.k.a. damper), at the
apex of the cone, usually made of fabric in a corrugated form,
and the "surround" or bellows, which is usually a roll of
rubber or
foam
(but occasionally of corrugated fabric) attached to the outer
circumference of the cone and to the frame.
When an electrical signal is applied to the voice coil, a
magnetic field is created by the electric
current in the coil which thus becomes an electromagnet. The
coil and the driver's magnetic system interact, generating a
mechanical force which causes the coil and cone to move back and
forth and so reproduce sound under the control of the applied
electrical signal coming from the
amplifier.
Driver design, and the combination of one or more drivers
into an enclosure to make a speaker system, is both an art and
science. Adjusting a design to improve performance is done with
instruments as well as an experienced ear. Designers can use an
anechoic chamber to ensure the speaker can be measured
independently of room effects. Some developers (such as
Bose) eschew anechoic chambers in favor of specific
standardized room set-ups intended to simulate real-life
listening conditions. Some of the issues speaker designers must
confront are lobing, phase effects, off axis response, crossover
complications, and
psychoacoustics.
Most loudspeaker drivers are currently manufactured in
China.
The fabrication of finished loudspeaker systems is segmented,
depending largely on price point. High-end speaker systems are
usually made in the same region as their target markets and can
command prices of $10,000 per pair and up. The lowest-priced
speaker systems are mostly manufactured in China or other
low-cost manufacturing locations. Although the manufacture of
drivers has become essentially commoditized, the fabrication and
subsequent sale of finished speaker systems still carry high
profit margins. Partly for this reason, manufacturers are
increasingly combining power amplifier electronics (a typically
lower profit item) with finished speaker systems to create
"powered speakers" with an overall higher market value.
Driver types
Exploded view of a
tweeter.
A
woofer is a driver capable of reproducing low (bass)
frequencies. The usable frequency range varies widely according
to design. Some woofers can cover the audio band from lowest
bass to 3
kHz,
while others only work up to 1 kHz or less. Some woofers are
capable of very deep bass performance in the proper enclosure,
while others become unusable or highly distorting below 50 or 60
Hz.
A
tweeter is a driver capable of reproducing the higher end of
the audio spectrum, usually from around 3-5 kHz up to 20 kHz and
beyond.
A
mid-range speaker, also called a
squawker, is designed to cover the middle of the audio
spectrum, typically from a few hundred Hertz to about 4-5 kHz.
Midranges are used when the other drivers are incapable of
adequately covering the full audio range without them. They also
increase system maximum output, as tweeters in 3-way systems can
be spared the requirement to reproduce lower frequencies, which
increases their maximum sound output before damage.
A
full-range driver is designed to have as wide a frequency
response as possible. These drivers are small, typically 2 to 6
inches (5 to 16 cm) in diameter, to permit reasonable high
frequency response, but this means they have limited sound
output (especially at low frequencies) and limited power
handling capacity (due to a small voice coil). They often employ
an additional cone called a whizzer, a small, light cone
attached to the woofer's apex near the dust cap, to extend the
high frequency response and broaden the high frequency
directivity. The main cone is so built as to flex more in this
region at high frequencies than the rest of the cone. The result
is that the whizzer cone is the chief part of the speaker with
significant output at higher frequencies. However, there exist
full-range drivers which are capable of reproducing a frequency
range from 50 Hz to 20 kHz and higher without a whizzer cone,
though not at high output levels. Full range drivers are one
approach to avoiding the audible effects of phase interference
and level matching between drivers caused by different drive
location and crossover issues.
A
subwoofer is a woofer driver used only for the lowest part
of the audio spectrum. A typical subwoofer only reproduces
sounds below perhaps 120 Hz; some can go lower than 20 Hz.
Because the intended range of frequencies is limited, subwoofer
design is usually simpler, often consisting of a single,
subwoofer enclosed in a suitable (often
bass reflex) cabinet. Subwoofers are often supplied with
power amplifiers and electronic filters, with additional
controls relevant to low frequency reproduction, such as phase
switches. These are generally built directly into the cabinet.
Some subwoofer systems also include sophisticated feedback
mechanisms such as
accelerometers or back
EMF
sensors used to adjust amplifier levels to compensate for
deviations in the actual motion of the driver cone. These last
are commonly called bass "servo drivers"; the two components,
driver and amplifier electronics, cannot be used independently
and should be thought of as a single unit.
A full-range driver in a vented enclosure; the port
is at the bottom.
Full-range speaker systems are typically multi-driver
systems, particularly when high
SPL output or high accuracy are required. "Multi driver"
means a speaker system containing two or more drive units,
possibly including woofers, midranges, tweeters, or
supertweeters. In loudspeaker specifications, systems are often
classified as "N-way speakers", where N indicates the number of
separate frequency bands, usually separated by an electrical
filter called a crossover. A 2-way system will have woofer and
tweeter sections; a 3-way system a combination of woofer,
tweeter, and mid-range speakers, and so on.
The
audio crossover between drivers has considerable effect on
the system's performance. For instance, passive crossover
circuits, using only
capacitors,
inductors, and
resistors, can require phase reversal of drivers to avoid
interference cancellations in the crossover frequency region
between them. Additionally, such crossovers sit between the
amplifier and the speaker drivers, which changes the electrical
relationship (including the
damping factor) between them. Because passive crossovers
have audible effects on speaker system sound, and because
electronics costs have continued to fall, many designers avoid
them altogether. Instead, they filter the signal into
appropriate frequency bands before amplification, using a power
amplifier for each driver. The crossover circuit used is
commonly an active one, using gain elements such as
transistors and
integrated circuits, though passive low level crossovers are
possible and have been used. This bi-amp or tri-amp approach
costs more, but can avoid some of the troubles inherent in
designing a good-sounding passive crossover matched to the
drivers being used. It is commonly used in professional sound
reinforcement because it avoids the power loses inherent in
single amplifier setups.
Enclosures
-
Main article:
Loudspeaker enclosure
A 4-way speaker system. It is very narrow, to
minimize cabinet diffraction effects.
Loudspeaker drivers are commonly mounted in an
enclosure, or cabinet. The main role of these is to prevent
the sound emitted from the rear of the loudspeaker being
transmitted into the listening space to prevent interference of
this sound with sound emitted from the front of the loudspeaker
as it will be out phase. This interference in all cases will
provide a reduction in the accuracy of the reproduction of the
sound as recorded (sound quality) and so its reduction as far as
possible is desired. At certain frequencies, especially low
frequencies, this inference can also actually cancel out the
sound emitted from the front resulting in a reduction in volume.
The enclosure thus prevents transmission of the sound emitted
from the rear of the loudspeaker to the listening space by
ideally being rigid and airtight. However, this enclosure will
then induce internal reflection of sound which can then be
retransmitted through the loudspeaker cone; again resulting in
degradation of sound quality. This is reduced through internal
absorption frequently through the use of absorptive materials
(often called "damping") such as fiberglass, wool or synthetic
fiber batting within the enclosure. Also the internal form of
the enclosure can be designed to reduce this by reflecting
sounds away from the loudspeaker where they can then be
absorbed. There can be problems with the common box shaped
enclosure in that its parrallel opposite faces can induce
internal reverberations of sound which is undesired.
Techniques used to reduce transmission of sound through the
walls of the cabinet include thicker cabinet walls, harder wall
material, internal bracing, curved cabinet walls or more rarely
visco-elastic materials or thin
lead
sheeting applied to interior enclosure walls.
A notable attempt to reduce internal reflection can be seen
in
Bowers & Wilkins Nautilus speaker with the use of tapering
tubes as enclosures which act in the opposite way to horns -
progressively absorbing the sound as the tube tapers and almost
completely preventing re-transmission of sound through the front
of the speaker.
In one sense, drivers would ideally be mounted in a baffle
which extended to infinite distance in all directions to prevent
the back wave from the driver from ever reaching the listener.
After
World War II, and before stereo, high fidelity speakers were
sometimes mounted in a room wall, providing something
approaching an infinite baffle. Because they are attempts to
approach such behavior, large sealed box speaker systems are
sometimes called infinite baffles.
Musical instrument speakers (as part of a guitar amp stack,
perhaps) are commonly open-back cabinets in a practically sized
approach to an infinite baffle. Modern professional sound
reinforcement systems never use such cabinets.
More sophisticated designs have attempted to improve on this
performance by using the enclosure to improve the acoustic
loading of the air on the driver and so the acoustic output,
especially at low frequencies. This is the primary reason for
the many differences between enclosures.
In an attempt to make the transition between drivers as
seamless as possible, system designers have also attempted in
recent years to time-align or phase adjust the drivers, which
often involves moving one or more drivers forward or back, so
that the acoustic centers of the drivers is in the same vertical
plane. This sometimes involves tilting the face of a
floor-mounted speaker back, or providing separate enclosure
mounting for the drivers, or, less commonly, using electronic
techniques to achieve the same effect. These attempts account
for some of the unusual cabinet arrangements in speaker systems.
Another issue designers must manage is sound wave
diffraction caused by the surfaces (face plate, cabinet,
etc.) in which a driver is mounted. This is usually a problem at
higher frequencies, as those wavelengths are similar to, or
smaller than, cabinet dimensions. The problem is addressed by
rounding the front edges of the cabinet or by using a smaller or
narrower enclosure, or by strategic arrangement of the drivers.
Sometimes, an absorptive layer such as felt is added to the
mounting surface around a driver to reduce such effects.
Wiring connections
Five-way binding posts on a loudspeaker
connected using
banana plugs.
Most loudspeakers use two wiring points to connect to the
source of the signal (for example, to the
audio amplifier or
receiver). This is usually done using
binding posts, or spring clips on the back of the enclosure.
If the wires for left and right speakers (in a stereo setup)
are not connected in phase with each other (the + and -
connections on the speaker and amplifier should be connected to
each other) the loudspeakers will be out of phase and
destructive sound wave
interference will occur when a common signal is sent to each
speaker. In this case, any motion one cone (usually the woofer)
makes will be opposite to the other. This type of wiring error
doesn't damage speakers but does create inverse sound waves that
partially cancel those from the other speaker. Due to the
spacing of the speakers, the bass frequencies are where this
phenomenon is most apparent.
Electrical characteristics of a
dynamic loudspeaker
Specifications label on a loudspeaker
-
Main article:
Electrical characteristics of a dynamic loudspeaker
Speaker specifications generally include:
- Speaker or driver type (individual units only)
Full-range,
woofer,
tweeter or
mid-range.
- Rated Power Nominal or continuous
power and peak or maximum short-term power that the
loudspeaker can handle (that is, maximum allowed output
power of the amplifier without destroying the loudspeaker.
It is not the power that the passive loudspeaker
produces).
-
Impedance typically 4 Ω (ohms), 8 Ω, etc.
- Baffle or enclosure type (enclosed systems only)
Sealed,
bass reflex, etc.
- Number of drivers (complete speaker systems only)
2-way, 3-way, etc.
and optionally:
- Crossover frequency(ies) (complete multi-driver
systems only) The frequency or frequencies where
electrical filtering occurs.
-
Frequency response The measured or specified
variance in sound pressure level to a constant input over a
specified range of frequencies, often including a variance
such as within +/- 2.5 dB.
-
Thiele/Small parameters (individual drivers only)
these include the driver's Fs (resonance
frequency), Qts (the driver's Q or damping factor
at resonance), Vas (the equivalent air compliance
volume of the driver), etc.
The load a driver presents to an amplifier consists of a
complex
electrical impedance, a combination of resistance, and both
capacitive and inductive reactance, reflecting the properties of
the driver, its mechanical motion, and the effects of air
loading on the driver as modified by the enclosure. Most
amplifiers (amps) output specifications are given at a
specific power into an ideal resistive load. However, a
loudspeaker with a nominal impedance of 8Ω does not really have
a constant resistance. Instead, the voice coil is inductive, the
enclosure changes the characteristics of the driver, and a
passive crossover between the drivers and the amplifier
contributes its own variations. All these parameters vary,
depending on the frequency of the signal. Some amplifiers can
manage these varying loads, while others are less capable.[3]
Loudspeaker efficiency is defined as the sound power output
divided by the electrical power input. Most loudspeakers are
actually very inefficient transducers. Only about 1% of the
electrical energy sent by an amplifier to a typical home
loudspeaker is converted to the acoustic energy we can hear --
the remainder is converted to heat. There are three reasons for
this low efficiency. The first is the difficulty of making a
quickly moving diaphragm couple tightly to its 'motor' (a magnet
structure for voice coil drivers, electrically charged plates
for electrostatic speakers, etc). The second, especially at low
frequencies, is the difficulty of achieving proper
impedance matching between the
acoustic impedance of the drive unit and that of the air
into which it is radiating. The third is electrical impedance,
primarily in the driver voice coil(s). The better the acoustic
impedance match between driver and air, the higher the
efficiency. It is not possible to combine high efficiency,
especially at low frequencies, with compact enclosure size, and
adequate low frequency response. One can, more or less, only
choose two of the three parameters when designing a speaker
system. So, for example, if extended low frequency performance
and a small box size are important, one must accept low
efficiency. This
rule of thumb is sometimes called Hoffman's Iron Law (after
J. A. Hoffman, the H in
KLH).
Fully characterizing the sound output of a loudspeaker in
detail is difficult (for example, phase characteristics vs.
frequency, impulse response at various frequencies, directivity
vs. frequency, distortion vs. SPL output (eg,
harmonic,
intermodulation, compression, etc), stored energy (that is,
ringing) vs. frequency and output level, small signal vs. large
signal performance, etc.), but the raw sound pressure level
output is rather easier to measure. The sound pressure level
(SPL) a loudspeaker produces is measured in
decibels (dBspl).
Driver ratings based on the SPL for a given input voltage
(corresponds to power for a particular driver impedance) are
known as sensitivity ratings and are, approximately, equivalent
to efficiency. Sensitivity is usually defined as so many dB at
1 W electrical input, measured at 1 meter. The voltage used is
often 2.83 VRMS, which happens to be 1 watt into an
8 Ω (nominal) speaker impedance (nominally true for many speaker
systems). Measurements taken with this reference are quoted as
dB with 2.83 V @ 1 m.
The sound pressure is measured at (or scaled to be equivalent
to a measurement taken at) one meter from the loudspeaker and
on-axis or directly in front of it under the conditions that the
loudspeaker is radiating into an infinitely large space and
mounted on an
infinite baffle. Clearly then, sensitivity does not
correlate precisely with efficiency as it also depends on the
directivity of the driver being tested and the acoustic
environment in front of the actually deployed loudspeaker. As a
simple example, a cheerleader's horn makes more sound output in
the direction it is pointed than the cheerleader could by
herself, but the horn did not improve or increase the
cheerleader's total sound power output much, it just focused it
into a smaller space.
- Typical home loudspeakers have sensitivities of about 85
to 95 dB for 1 W @ 1 m - an efficiency of 0.5-4%.
- Sound reinforcement and public address loudspeakers have
sensitivities of perhaps 95 to 102 dB for 1 W @ 1 m - an
efficiency of 4-10%.
- Rock concert, stadium PA, marine hailing, etc speakers
all have higher sensitivities -- maybe 103 to 110 dB for 1 W
@ 1 m - an efficiency of 10-20%.
A driver with a higher maximum power rating cannot
necessarily be driven to louder levels than a lower rated one,
since sensitivity and power handling are independent. In the
examples which follow, assume for simplicity that the drivers
being compared have the same electrical impedance, are operated
at the same frequency which is within both driver's respective
pass bands, and that power compression is and distortion are
low. For the first example, a speaker 3 dB more sensitive than
another will produce double the sound pressure level (or be 3 dB
louder) for the same power input. Thus a 100 W driver ("A")
rated at 92 dB for 1 W @ 1 m sensitivity will output twice as
much acoustic power as a 200 W driver ("B") rated at 89 dB for
1 W @ 1 m when both are driven with 100 W of input power. For
this particular example, when driven at 100 W, speaker A will
produce the same SPL, or loudness, speaker B would produce with
200 W input. Thus a 3 dB increase in sensitivity of the speaker
means that it will need half the amplifier power to achieve a
given SPL; this translates into a smaller, less complex power
amplifier and, often, to reduced overall cost.
Interaction with the listening
environment
The interaction of a loudspeaker system with its environment
is complex and is largely out of the designer's control. Most
listening rooms present a more or less reflective environment,
depending on size, shape, volume, and furnishings. This means
the sound reaching a listener's ears consists not only of direct
sound, but also of that sound delayed by traveling to and from
(and being modified by) reflections from one or more surfaces.
These reflected sound waves, when added to the direct sound,
cause cancellation and addition at certain frequencies, changing
the timbre and character of the signal being reproduced. Our
brains are very sensitive to these small variations. This is
part of the reason why a loudspeaker system sounds different at
different listening positions or in different rooms.
A significant factor in the sound of a loudspeaker system is
the amount of absorption and diffusion present in the
environment. Clapping one's hands in an empty room, without
draperies or carpet, will produce a zippy fluttery echo which is
due both to a lack of absorption and to reverberation (that is,
repeated echoes). The addition of hard surfaced furniture, wall
hangings, and shelving will change the echoes, due primarily to
the diffusion caused by somewhat reflective objects with shapes
and textures having sizes on the order of the sound wavelengths
being diffused. This somewhat breaks up the simple reflections
otherwise caused by flat walls, floors and ceilings, and spreads
the reflected energy of an incident wave over a larger angle on
reflection.
Adding carpet, curtains, tapestries, people, or soft surfaced
furniture will further change the interaction of a loudspeaker
with the room by absorbing sound at various frequencies and
reducing reflections at those frequencies. By and large, the
thinner a material is, the less likely it will have an effect at
low frequencies. An overabundance of absorption at high
frequencies can be caused by large areas of absorptive materials
and can cause a speaker system to sound deficient at higher
frequencies, and likewise minimal absorption can cause an
otherwise adequate loudspeaker to sound too bright or sibilant
at those frequencies.
Loudspeaker placement
For good sound in a home environment, a listening room should
have a balance of diffusion and absorption. Most systems will
sound best when the speakers are set up more or less
symmetrically with respect to the listener and also to room
boundaries. Early reflections (the first reflection of a
particular sound) do the most to color the sound (due to the
so-called
Haas effect in psychoacoustics), so placing speakers too
near the rear or side walls is generally something to be
avoided, although judicious use of absorbing or diffusing
materials can somewhat moderate an otherwise poor placement
location. Mounting a speaker in a wall (or in a bookshelf with
books flush with the baffle) somewhat removes diffractive
boundary concerns, but limits placement flexibility. In
professional applications, placement is largely controlled by
the location of the listening audience, required appearance (for
example, prominence or invisibility), and available space. Fine
adjustment is often not possible.
Another factor in room acoustics is a phenomena called
standing waves. A one dimensional example is sound bouncing
between two reflective boundaries. Sound resonates, or
repeatedly reflects at particular frequencies, if the distance
between the boundaries corresponds to an integral number of half
wavelengths. Since sound travels at ~345 m/s, a pair of
reflective boundaries separated by 5 meters will cause
resonances at 34.5 Hz, 69 Hz, 103.5 Hz ..., recalling that
wavelength is the speed of sound divided by the frequency. It is
best, if possible, to arrange that no room wall length or height
is simply related to any other. A cubical listening room would
be most resonant since all dimensions are identical, with walls,
floor and ceiling parallel, thus reinforcing the resonance
modes. One approach is to ensure that each room dimension is
related to another by the
Golden Mean, which will ensure that the unavoidable
reflections between walls are not reinforced by any others.
In a typical rectangular listening room, this resonant
phenomenon happens in three dimensions, and there are even more
complex interactions that involve four or even all six boundary
surfaces. It is primarily an issue for low frequencies which are
not much affected by such things as furniture or its placement.
In addition, the location of the loudspeakers, and the listener,
with respect to room boundaries affect how strongly the
resonances are excited. Many people are familiar with certain
locations in a room, club, or building which have much more, or
less, bass - most usually near room walls or corners. This is
because standing wave patterns are most pronounced in these
locations and at lower frequencies, below the
Schroeder frequency - typically around 200-300 Hz, depending
on room size.
Loudspeaker directivity
This is an important issue because it affects the frequency
balance of sound a listener hears, and also the interaction of
the speaker system with the room.
In general, a sound source will radiate of one of four basic
ways: as a
point source, a line source, a planar source, or a 3D
source.
An extremely small point source is often considered ideal,
because it radiates all frequencies equally in all directions in
a spherical radiation pattern, and thus favors none. A
theoretical line sources may be finite or effectively infinite,
and will radiate sound in a cylindrical pattern. These first two
source types are not actually practical, although real sound
sources may approximate them, especially at some frequencies. In
real life, most speaker systems and individual drivers are
actually complex 3D shapes such as cones and domes.
Some drivers, and some enclosures (eg, horns) take advantage
of directivity in that, rather than radiating in a wide pattern,
they focus sound into a constrained pattern. This is desirable
for large areas such as theaters, concert halls, arenas, and
outdoor areas where the listener(s) may be a great distance from
the sound source and yet should still hear well.
Point sources
Point sources can be approximated (at least at low
frequencies) as a
planar form that creates a sound wave which becomes more
directional as frequency increases, because the wavelength of
the sound wave becomes small compared to the size of the
diaphragm. That is, the intensity of the sound produced varies
depending on the listener's angle relative to the central axis
of the speaker.
A common variation on the dynamic loudspeaker cone design
uses a
dome as the moving part instead of the familiar inverted
cone. Contrary to intuition, making the moving surface a dome
rather than an inverted cone does not always help to direct
sound evenly in all directions. The dome is used primarily
because, in the case of a tweeter, its radiating surface is
smaller than the voice coil and because a conical shape is
difficult to fit in the tweeter structure -- unless specially
modified, the magnet system's pole piece will mechanically
interfere with cone motion at high amplitudes. Some tweeters do
have inverted domes, however, but the pole piece is specially
configured to accommodate the dome's shape. Some tweeters (TDL
and other manufacturer use this shape) use bullet shaped domes
instead of domes with a constant radius. The intent is to reduce
or eliminate bending in the center of the dome (consider that an
egg shape is harder to push in at the pointed end than at the
other). Finally, some manufacturers leave out the center of the
dome altogether and only use the outer ring (called a ring
radiator) to altogether avoid distortions of the inner part of
the dome due to bending effects (for example, some models from
Scan-Speak,
Kea Audio, Vifa etc). A ring radiator also has better
directivity (that is, is less directive) than a dome. A typical
one inch dome tweeter begins to be directive at about 8000 Hz,
below this frequency it approximates a point source, above this
frequency, it becomes increasingly directional. At distances
more than ~7 times the diameter of the cone or dome, the
response is essentially that of a flat plane, at closer
distances, the exact shape of the diaphragm becomes increasingly
important.
Two dimensional and three dimensional sound sources can be
monopolar, dipolar or bipolar. Most planar (that is, flat
diaphragm) drivers are dipolar, which means that sound from the
rear of the diaphragm is permitted to freely radiate. When the
rear radiation is absorbed or trapped in a box, the diaphragm
becomes a monopole radiator. Bipolar speakers, made by mounting
in-phase monopoles on opposite sides of a box, are a method of
approximating a point source or pulsating sphere.
Various manufacturers use assorted driver mounting
arrangements, and the resulting radiation patterns, to more
closely simulate the way sound is produced by real instruments,
or to mimic one of the ideal sound source types, or simply to
create a controlled energy distribution. Most professional audio
speaker systems use horns or other dispersion control techniques
because broad dispersion is a liability in many commercial
situations such as concert sound or public address contexts.
The Manger bending wave transducer uses a bending wave
scheme, in which vibration waves start from the center of a
round flat diaphragm and travel to the outside. The rigidity of
the material increases from the center to the outside. Short
wavelength sound therefore radiate primarily from the inner
area, while longer waves reach the edge of the speaker. To
prevent reflections, long waves are absorbed by a surrounding
damper. The Manger transducer covers the frequency range from
80 Hz to 35,000 Hz, and is close to an ideal point sound source.
The Walsh loudspeaker systems from Ohm Acoustics have been quite
similar in their bending scheme, though different in numerous
details.
Coaxial speakers have been made commercially since the 1930s.
These approximate a point source by moving the radiating axes of
the various drivers close to the same point, usually with
benefits in polar response. Coaxial mounting eliminates
crossover lobing (that is, interference between drivers caused
by non coincident placement). The woofer cone often acts as a
horn in many respects. The technique of using concentric
radiating elements for a multiway system has been used by
several manufacturers, notably Technics.
Cabasse recently published a paper analyzing 3-way and even
4-way coaxial speakers using concentric ring-shaped radiators.
Several manufacturers (for example, Tannoy, Eminence, etc.)
still build 2-way coaxial drivers in which the tweeter fires
through a horn that passes through the woofer pole piece, and
several (for example, KEF, SEAS, Kea-Audio, Tannoy etc.) build
coaxial units in which the tweeter is mounted on the woofer pole
piece. The small form factor this last approach requires has
been made more effective by recent developments in rare earth
magnets.[4]
Several manufacturers have attempted to simulate a point
source by approximating a pulsating sphere. In the 1960s,
Amar Bose (an
MIT
Professor) designed a one-eighth sphere loudspeaker system
covered in small full-range drivers for room corner placement.
The 1801 produced a wavefront very like that of an ideal sphere
when wall reflections were included. Few were built and the
system was not a commercial success, but it gave rise to
commercially successful speaker system designs (the 901, most
importantly) which also use multiple small drivers pointed in
various directions to create a mixture of direct and reflected
sound claimed to approximate that of a concert hall. In the 1801
and the 901, the small drivers involved were not actually
inherently full-range and required considerable equalization to
provide adequate low frequency performance and to compensate for
decreasing high frequency performance. Especially at low
frequencies, this approach demanded rather more amplifier power
than competing speakers of the time. Both techniques have
remained somewhat controversial.
The
Ohm speaker drivers, whose principle was invented by
Lincoln Walsh, use a single voice coil/cone mounted
vertically, firing downwards into the top of the cabinet,
but instead of the normal almost flat cone, has an extended cone
entirely exposed at the top of the speaker. The usual problem
with designing a cone driver is how to keep the cone as stiff as
possible (without adding too much mass) so that it moves as a
unit, and does not support
traveling waves nor distort during cone breakup. The Walsh
driver was so designed that the entire purpose of the cone's
motion was to generate traveling waves down the cone from the
magnetic motor (that is, voice coil and magnet structure) at the
top. As the waves moved down the cone, the effect was to
reproduce a 360 degree wavefront at all frequencies, more or
less like a
cylinder. This created a very effective omni-directional
radiator (although it suffered the same "planarity" effect as
ribbon tweeters for higher-frequency sounds ) and eliminated all
problems of multiple drivers, such as crossover issues, phase
anomalies between drivers, etc. However, in practice it was
found necessary to use a very complex and expensive cone made of
various materials along its length.
High fidelity speaker systems of this design are still being
produced by Ohm in the US, and in Germany, by German-Physik and,
as a variant, by Manger. This approach has not been used in
professional sound reinforcement, most likely due to the
delicacy of the physically large cone structure and the inherent
cylindrical directivity.
Line sources
A ribbon speaker consists of a thin metal-film ribbon
suspended in a magnetic field. The electrical signal is applied
to the ribbon which moves with it, thus creating the sound. The
advantage of a ribbon driver is that the ribbon has very little
mass;
thus, it can accelerate very quickly, yielding very good
high-frequency response. Ribbon loudspeakers are often very
fragile -- some can be torn by a strong puff of air. Most ribbon
tweeters emit sound in a dipole pattern; a very few have
backings which limit the dipole radiation pattern. Above and
below the ends of the more or less rectangular ribbon, there is
less audible output due to phase cancellation, but the precise
amount of directivity depends on ribbon length. Ribbon designs
generally require exceptionally powerful magnets which make them
costly to manufacture. Ribbons have a very low resistance that
most amplifiers cannot drive directly. A step down transformer
is therefore typically used to increase the current through the
ribbon. The amplifier "sees" a load that is the ribbon's
resistance times the transformer turns ratio squared. The
transformer must be carefully designed so that its frequency
response and parasitic losses do not degrade the sound, further
increasing cost and complication relative to conventional
designs.
Planar magnetic speakers (having printed or embedded
conductors on a flat diaphragm) are sometimes described as
"ribbons", but are not truly ribbon speakers. The term planar is
generally reserved for speakers which have roughly rectangular
shaped flat radiating surfaces. Planar magnetic speakers consist
of a flexible membrane with a voice coil printed or mounted on
them. The current flowing through the coil interacts with the
magnetic field of carefully placed magnets on either side of the
diaphragm, causing the membrane to vibrate more or less
uniformly and without much bending or wrinkling. The driving
force covers a large percentage of the membrane surface and
reduces resonance problems inherent in coil-driven flat
diaphragms. Many designs touted as "ribbons" are in fact planar
magnetic. Many of these designs have small cavities between the
magnet structures and the diaphragm. This is not ideal and it
sometimes creates a "cavity resonance" response peak that
requires corrective filtration. Failure to correct this cavity
resonance is a cause of the steely or shrill sound sometimes
attributed to these designs.
There have also been many attempts to reduce the size of
speaker systems, or alternatively to make them less obvious. One
such attempt was the development of voice coil driven 'exciters'
mounted to flat panels to act as sound sources. These can then
be made in a neutral color and hung on walls where they will be
less noticeable than many speakers, or can be deliberately
painted with patterns in which case they can function
decoratively. An example is Wharfedale Pro's 'Loudpanel' series.
There are two related problems with flat panel techniques:
first, a flat panel is necessarily more flexible than a cone
shape in the same material, and therefore will move as a single
unit even less, and second, resonances in the panel are
difficult to control, leading to considerable distortions. Some
progress has been made using such lightweight, rigid, yet
damped, materials as
Styrofoam, and there have been several flat panel systems
commercially produced in recent years.
A newer implementation of the flat panel speaker system
involves an intentionally flexible panel and an "exciter",
mounted off-center in a location such that it excites the panel
to vibrate, but with minimal resonances. Speakers using NXT
techniques design methods can reproduce sound with a wide
directivity pattern (paradoxically somewhat like a point source)
and have been used in some computer speaker designs and a few
small 'shelf systems' from such manufacturers as
TEAC
and
Philips.
Other driver designs
Other types of drivers which depart from the most commonly
used electro-dynamic driver mounted in an enclosure include:
Horn loudspeakers
Painting of Nipper, used by Gramophone Ltd and
Victor Talking Machine, UK, & then RCA, US
Horn speakers have been designed and built since the late
19th century; one is prominent in the
RCA
logo with Nipper the dog listening to His Master's Voice. Horns
using modern electrodynamic drivers are a more recent
development beginning shortly after the
First World War. The increasing cross-sectional area of the
horn allows for a greater mechanical advantage of the driver
against the resistance of air, increasing the efficiency of the
driving element. An efficient home loudspeaker system has a
sensitivity of around 90 dB @ 2.83 volts (1 watt @ 8 Ohms) @
1 Meter distance, while several home-use horn loaded speakers
are rated as high as 100 dB @ 2.83 volts (1 watt @ 8 Ohms) @
1 Meter. This is a ten-fold increase in output at one watt,
resulting in an output level which would require 10 watts from
the speaker rated at 90 dB sensitivity, and is invaluable in
some applications. The length and cross sectional mouth area
required to create a bass or sub-bass horn may necessitate a
horn several feet long. Due to the large volume that such a horn
occupies, it is often necessary to fold the horn in order to
allow it to fit its environment. Formerly, largely after WWII
and before the stereo era, horns whose mouths took up much of a
room wall were not uncommon amongst hi-fi fans. Such
installations became much less acceptable when two were
required, and entirely unthinkable in modern, multi-channel home
systems.
Few full-range horns are being commercially produced for home
use, and those which are have very high prices. But there is an
active
DIY horn building community around the world which has
produced some visually striking enclosures, some claimed to be
audibly excellent as well. More common are 'short horns' (of a
practical, though still large, size) used for professional sound
work. These are typically bass reflex enclosures usually with
two large drivers (12" or 15") firing into a common horn with a
very large throat. The horn in these cases is more used for
dispersion control than acoustic loading at low frequencies. The
Altec Lansing
Voice of the Theater model is an example, first used in
movie theater sound five decades ago.
Piezoelectric speakers
Piezoelectric speakers are frequently used as beepers in
watches and other electronic devices, and are sometimes used
as tweeters in less-expensive speaker systems, such as computer
speakers and portable radios. Piezoelectric speakers have
several advantages over conventional loudspeakers:
- they have no voice-coil, therefore there is no
electrical
inductance to manage
- it is easy to couple high-frequency electrical energy
into the piezoelectric transducer since the transducers are
resistant to overloads which would normally destroy the
voice coil of a conventional loudspeaker.
- they are an inherently capacitive electrical load so
they usually do not require an external cross-over network.
They can simply be placed in parallel with conventional
inductive voice coil drivers.
There are also disadvantages:
- they have (in most cases) a frequency response not as
good as other technologies. This is why they are generally
used in single frequency (beeper) or non-critical
applications
- some amplifiers do not operate well into capacitive
loads, causing high frequency oscillation, which can cause
distortion or amplifier failure.
Plasma arc speakers
Plasma arc loudspeakers use electrical
plasma as a driver. Since plasma has minimal mass, but is
charged and therefore can be manipulated by an
electric field, the result is a very linear output at
frequencies far higher than the audible range. Problems of
maintenance and reliability for this design tend to make it
unsuitable for mass market use; in one design, the plasma is
generated from
helium gas stored in a tank and carefully released. A less
expensive variation on this theme is the use of a flame for the
driver, as flames contain ionized (electrically charged) gases.[5]
The major innovator of these tweeters was DuKane Corporation,
who made the Ionovac (marketed as the Ionofane in the UK).
Currently, only one manufacturer, in Germany, is making plasma
arc tweeters.
Heil Air Motion Transducers
Dr
Oscar Heil invented this design in the 1960s.
ESS,
a California manufacturer, licensed it, employed Dr Heil, and
produced a range of speaker systems using them as tweeters
during the 1970s and 1980s.
Radio Shack, a large US retail store chain, also sold
speaker systems using them as tweeters for a time.
In this approach, a pleated diaphragm is mounted in a
magnetic field and forced to close and open under control of a
music signal. Air is forced from between the pleats in
accordance with the imposed signal, generating sound. The
drivers are less fragile than ribbons and considerably more
efficient (and able to produce higher absolute output levels)
than ribbon, electrostatic, or planar magnetic tweeter designs.
At present, there are two manufacturers of these drivers, both
in Germany, one of which produces a range of high end
professional speakers using tweeters and midrange drivers based
on the technology.
Electrostatic loudspeakers
Electrostatic loudspeakers give a more linear response than
electromechanical voice coils, though for considerably reduced
maximum motion amplitude. The entire diaphragm is driven by
electrostatic charges and is very closely controlled. For many
years electrostatic loudspeakers had a reputation as an
unreliable and occasionally dangerous product. A primary
disadvantage was that the signal must be converted to a very
high voltage at low current, which was problematic for
reliability and maintenance. For instance, such charges attract
dust, and many of these the speakers developed a tendency to
arc, particularly where the dust provided a partial
discharge path. Those familiar with the
bug zapper type of insect control device will understand.
The point where the arc occurs often became more prone to arcing
as carbon built up from the burned dust. Modern versions are
less troublesome in several respects.
Full range electrostatic loudspeakers are large by nature. An
early model, the KLH Model 9, was taller than most people. In
addition, electrostatics are inherently dipole radiators and
cannot, in practice, be used in enclosures to increase their
efficiency as with common cone drives. In electrostatic
loudspeakers, diaphragm excursion is limited to fractions of a
millimeter whereas more ordinary dynamic cone loudspeakers can
usually move many millimeters, even up to centimeters in some
instances. This means that the membrane of a full range
electrostatic loudspeaker must be larger than an equivalent
dynamic loudspeaker to produce even marginally acceptable low
frequency performance and output level. Electrostatic tweeters
have proven to be more practical and are more widely used.
Digital speakers
Digital speakers are an experimental but venerable
technology, having been the subject of experiments by
Bell Labs as far back as the 1920s. The design is simple;
each bit
drives a tiny speaker driver. A value of "1" causes that driver
to be driven to full amplitude; a value of "0" causes it to be
completely shut off. Increasingly
significant bits drive speakers of twice the area of the
previous (often in a ring around the previous driver).
The name is sometimes confused with speakers used with
digital equipment, such as computer sound systems; they are not
actually digital in this sense, being examples of typical if
usually small speaker designs.
There are two problems with this design which has led to it
being abandoned as impractical for the present. For a reasonable
number of bits (required for adequate sound reproduction
quality), the size of the system becomes very large. For
example, a 16 bit signal compatible with the 16 bit
audio CD standard, starting with a 2 square inch (13 cm²)
driver for the least significant bit, would require a total area
for the drivers of over 900 square feet (85 m²). Secondly, due
to
analog digital conversion, the effect of
aliasing is unavoidable, so that the audio output is
"reflected" at equal amplitude in the frequency domain, on the
other side of the
sampling frequency. Even accounting for the vastly lower
efficiency of speaker drivers at such high frequencies, the
result generates an unacceptably high level of
ultrasonics accompanying the desired output.
References
- ^
Tesla and the Loudspeaker. Retrieved on
2007-02-21.
- ^
Loudspeaker History. Retrieved on
2007-02-21.
- ^
Phase Angle Vs. Transistor Dissipation. Retrieved on
2007-02-21.
- ^
Audio Engineering Society - Convention Paper (PDF).
Retrieved on
2007-02-21.
- ^
http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives/feb98/888372043.Ot.r.html
See also
Wikimedia Commons has media related to:
Loudspeaker
-
Audiophile
-
Bandwidth extension
-
Computer speaker
-
Digital Speakers
-
Dust-cap
-
Electronics
-
Electrostatic speaker
-
Ferrofluid
-
Frequency response
-
Guitar speaker
-
Headphone
-
High-end audio
-
Home theater
-
Electrical impedance
-
Isobaric speakers
-
List of loudspeaker manufacturers
-
Loudspeaker acoustics
-
Loudspeaker measurement
-
Music centre
-
Rotary woofer
-
Sensitivity
-
Sound from ultrasound
-
Sound reproduction
-
Speaker wire
-
Studio monitor
-
Surround sound
External links
-
Avid Listener: Audiophile Bookmarks A directory of
stereo hi-fi manufacturers, dealers, distributors, and
information
-
ALMA - The International Loudspeaker Association - A
Forum for the Global Loudspeaker Industry
-
Hi-Fi speaker build - See a pair of hi-fi speakers being
built from a kit.
-
DIY Speakers at lalena.com - Tutorials and calculators
for constructing speaker boxes, crossovers, filters and more
-
Cable Nonsense - This newsgroup message from a speaker
manufacturer is very informative about issues of speaker
cables
-
The Audio Circuit - An almost complete listing of
loudspeaker manufacturers
-
Article on Tesla's contribution
-
Article on sensitivity and efficiency of loudspeakers.
-
several, varied, loudspeaker designs with discussion
Categories:
Wikipedia articles needing copy edit from February 2007
|
All articles needing copy edit |
NPOV disputes |
Wikipedia articles with off-topic sections |
Speakers |
Telecommunications history |
Sound technology