From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
An equal-loudness contour is a measure of sound
pressure (dB
SPL), over the
frequency spectrum, for which a listener perceives a
constant loudness. The unit of measurement for loudness levels
is the
phon, and by definition two sine waves that have equal phons
are equally loud.
The
human
auditory system is sensitive to frequencies from 20
Hz
to a maximum of around 20,000 Hz, although the hearing range
decreases with age. Within this range, the
human ear is most sensitive between 1 and 5
kHz,
largely due to the resonance of the
ear canal and the
transfer function of the
ossicles of the middle ear.
Equal-loudness contours were first measured by Fletcher and
Munson using headphones (1933). In their study, listeners were
presented with pure tones at various frequencies and over 10 dB
increments in stimulus intensity. For each frequency and
intensity, the listener was also presented with a reference tone
at 1000 Hz. The reference tone was adjusted until it was
perceived to be of the same loudness as the test tone. Loudness,
being a psychological quantity, is difficult to measure, so
Fletcher and Munson averaged their results over many test
subjects to derive reasonable averages.
A new experimental determination was made by
Robinson and Dadson (1956) which was believed to be more
accurate, and this became the basis for a standard (ISO 226)
which was considered definitive until 2003.
Because of perceived discrepancies between early and more
recent determinations, the
International Organization for Standardization (ISO)
recently set out to revise its standard curves as defined in ISO
226, referring to the results of several studies, by researchers
in Japan, Germany, Denmark, UK, and USA. (Japan was the greatest
contributor with about 40% of the data.) This has resulted in
the recent acceptance of new curves standardized as ISO
226:2003. The committee responsible for this revision has
commented on the surprisingly large differences, and the fact
that the original Fletcher-Munson contours are in better
agreement with recent results than the Robinson-Dadson, which
appear to differ by as much as 1015 dB especially in the
low-frequency region, for reasons that are not explained.[1]
Equal loudness curves derived using headphones are valid only
for side-presentation. Frontal presentation, from a single
central loudspeaker, can be expected to show reduced sensitivity
to high frequencies, which are partially masked by the head, and
presentation using two
loudspeakers, as for stereo will reveal more complicated
differences related the
HRTF
(head related transfer function) which is also dependent on
elevation of the sources and plays a major role in our ability
to locate sounds. The Robinson-Dadson determination used
loudspeakers, and for a long time the difference from the
Fletcher-Munson curves was explained on this basis. However,
the ISO report actually lists the latter as using 'compensated'
headphones.
Good headphones, well sealed to the ear, can provide a very
flat low-frequency pressure response measured at the ear canal,
and at low frequencies the ear is purely pressure sensitive and
the cavity formed between headphones and ear is too small to
introduce any modifying resonances. It is at high frequencies
that things get dubious, and the various resonances of pinnae
(outer ear) and ear canal are severely affected by proximity to
the headphone cavity. With speakers, exactly the opposite is
true, a flat low-frequency response being very hard to obtain
except in free space high above ground or in a very large and
anechoic chamber free from reflections down to 20 Hz. A flat
free-field response up to 20 kHz though is comparatively easy to
achieve with modern speakers on-axis. These facts have to be
borne in mind when comparing results of various attempts to
measure equal loudness contours.
The lowest equal loudness contour represents the quietest
audible tone and is also known as the
absolute threshold of hearing. The highest contour is the
threshold of pain.
Although the
A-weighting curve, in widespread use for noise measurement,
is said to have been based on the 40-phon
Fletcher-Munson curve, it should be noted that
determinations of equal loudness made using pure tones are not
directly relevant to our perception of noise. This is because
the cochlea in our inner ear analyses sounds in terms of
spectral content, each 'hair-cell' responding to a narrow band
of frequencies. The high-frequency bands are wider in absolute
terms than the low frequency bands, and therefore 'collect'
proportionately more power from a noise source. Equal loudness
curves derived using noise bands therefore show an upwards tilt
above 1 kHz and a downward tilt below 1 kHz.
The 468-weighting curve, originally proposed in
CCIR
recommendation 468, but later adopted by numerous standards
bodies (IEC, BSI, JIS) was based on BBC Research using a variety
of noise sources ranging from clicks to tone bursts to
pink noise, and incorporates a special
Quasi-peak rectifier to account for our reduced sensitivity
to short bursts and clicks. It is widely used by Broadcasters
and is by far the preferred weighting to use for all forms of
noise measurement, enabling subjectively valid comparisons of
different equipment types to be made even though they have
different noise spectra and characteristics.
See also
-
Fletcher-Munson curves
-
Robinson-Dadson curves
-
A-weighting
-
Sound level meter
-
Audiometry
-
Audio quality measurement
-
CCIR (ITU) 468 Noise Weighting
-
Noise
-
Noise measurement
-
dB(A)
External links
-
ISO Standard
-
Interesting comparisons of ISO with R-D and Fletcher Munson
(PDF)
-
Fletcher-Munson is not Robinson-Dadson (PDF)
-
Full Revision of International Standards for Equal-Loudness
Level Contours (ISO 226)
-
Test your hearing - A tool for measuring your equal-loudness
contours
-
Equal-loudness contour measurements in detail
Categories:
Acoustics |
Hearing |
Audio engineering